playoffs-2015-16-wbkbplayoffs2016

  

SCHEDULE | INTERACTIVE BRACKET 

Quarterfinals: Tuesday, Feb. 23 - 7 p.m.
 No. 3 Gustavus 65, No. 6 Saint Benedict 40 | Box Score | Recap |
No. 4 Concordia 85, No. 5 Bethel 76 | Box Score | Recap | Photos |

Semifinals: Thursday, Feb. 25 - 7 p.m.
No. 1 St. Thomas 69, No. 4 Concordia 48 | Box Score | Recap |
No. 2 Saint Mary's 78, No. 3 Gustavus 70 | Box Score | Recap |  

Championship: Saturday, Feb. 27  - 3 p.m.
No. 1 St. Thomas 77, No. 2 Saint Mary's 65 | Box Score | Recap | Photos |

         

TEAMS AND LINKS

  Seed     Team   MIAC    Overall      More Info  
No. 1
   St. Thomas 16-2 24-3   Team Page
No. 2
   Saint Mary's 14-4 21-6
   Team Page
No. 3   Gustavus 14-4 20-7   Team Page
No. 4
   Concordia 13-5 18-9
   Team Page
No. 5
   Bethel
 12-6 16-10
   Team Page
No. 6
   Saint Benedict
 10-8 15-11
   Team Page

MIAC Women's Basketball Playoffs News

2.27.16 - St. Thomas completes 'drive for five' with 2016 MIAC Women's Basketball Playoff title
2.25.16 - Top seeds St. Thomas, Saint Mary's advance to MIAC Women's Basketball Playoff title game
2.23.16 - Home-court advantage pays off in MIAC Women's Basketball Playoff quarterfinals
2.20.16 - St. Thomas secures second-straight title to headline 2016 MIAC Women's Basketball Playoffs

MIAC Women's Basketball Links

| Website | Standings | Schedule | Statistics | News | Athletes-of-the-Week | Season Preivew | Recordbook | Archives |

MIAC Women's Basketball Playoff Seeding Tie Breakers

1. Head to head competition ‐ winning percentage * against all teams tied.
2. Combined winning percentage* against all teams above those tied.
3. Winning percentage* against above teams beginning in rank order^.
4. Winning percentage* against teams below tied teams in descending order^.
5. Best road winning percentage*.
6. Coin flip.

*Winning percentage: When comparing records against a single team or a group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against the team or group are unequal. (Example: 2‐0 is better than 3‐1, but 2‐0 is not better than 1‐0).

^Rank order comparison: When arriving at another pair of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to their own tie‐breaking procedure), rather than the performance against the individual tied teams. (Example: Team A and Team B tie for fourth place. Team C and Team D tie for second place. The Team C‐D tiebreaker is settled first using tiebreaker criteria. If the Team A‐B tiebreaker reaches the second‐place team(s) in Criteria No. 3, Team A and Bs record will be compared collectively against Teams C and D, not individually against the winner of the C‐D tiebreaker first.)

2015-16 MIAC Playoffs & Championships